Out: Real Estate Porn. In: Real Estate Contrarianism
Out: Jane Jacobs. In: An “unholy alliance” of Jane Jacobs and the newly rehabilitated Robert Moses. Get used to it:
The planning phrase on everyone’s lips is “eyes on the street,” the reductio ad absurdum of the argument of the late Jane Jacobs’s 1961 Death and Life of Great American Cities. Jacobs argued that the lifeblood of her then-threatened neighborhood, the Village, was the shopkeepers and homeowners and stoop-sitters who watched the sidewalks and parks for free. Under City Planning commissioner Amanda Burden, neighborhoods are being contextually zoned to preserve their “special character.”
Jacobs’s vision was lovely but limited, with little room for new buildings, new neighborhoods. Rereading her arguments, one develops a sneaking admiration for the size of Moses’s thoughts. For the city to grow, it needed major change. Under Bloomberg, big thinking is happening again. What we have is a — some would say unholy — alliance of Bob and Jane. Exaltation of the neighborhood, coupled with the idea of building new ones from scratch. The Bloomberg administration still lags in taste at times. Why does every economic-development initiative have to be as big as possible? (Note to gadflies: Many of these projects are not yet set in stone. If you hate it, you can still change it. Start your blog now. But also start imagining an alternative — preferably in PowerPoint.)
OK, smart alec, you asked for it: newyorkmagazineistryingtobeohsocontrarian.com. I think the URL is available!
Posted: May 30th, 2006 | Filed under: Architecture & Infrastructure