The Tallboy Rebellion
Don’t just stand there, create an acronym:
Posted: December 22nd, 2006 | Filed under: Consumer IssuesA proposed booze ban on Metro-North and the Long Island Rail Road has a group of commuters banding together to insist that the next stop not be prohibition.
. . .
Board member Mitchell Pally said the MTA, a state entity, shouldn’t encourage alcohol use. Some riders drive home after riding the train, he said, raising a safety concern. And alcohol use can lead to boorish behavior, Pally said.
But a spokesman for the recently formed Commuters Allied for Responsible Enjoyment, or CARE, said taking away a cold beer on the ride home after a hard day at the office would be an injustice.
“I’ve been burdened by people talking loudly and too long on their cell phones, by people eating pungent foods . . . awful odors from the bathrooms and overcrowding, but I’ve never had a problem where someone was acting in a drunken manner,” CARE spokesman Richard Shea said.
Kevin Pearce, a Metro-North rider and founding member of CARE, said the concept of Pally’s prohibition is patronizing and insulting.
“I’m not a child,” Pearce, an editor at a cable television network, said. “I’m not the frat-house rush chairman. I’m an ordinary taxpaying commuter who is a calm, peaceful person, just like 99.9% of people on the train.”
Another founding member and Metro-North rider said a booze ban would be an affront to American freedom – and he’s from London, where they still stop traffic for royalty.
“It’s preposterous,” said David Karat, a finance executive. “All we’re trying to do is have a quiet respectable drink on the train on our way home to our families.”
The first shot in the battle will be a letter-writing campaign to pressure MTA board members and elected officials to reject any ban. CARE will soon have a Web site up and running (www.alliedcommuters.com).